Villeda et al v. Target Corp.
| Ramon Villeda and Angelica Villeda |
| Target Corporation |
| 2:2023cv00613 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION to elect referral of action to ADR by Angelica Villeda, Ramon Villeda. (Yurtsan, Andrey) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Yurtsan, Andrey) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Target Corporation. (Reihl, Lori) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Target Corporation.(Reihl, Lori) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2023-00334898 by Target Corporation. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10779188) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Adverse Party, #3 Declaration of Lori A. Reihl, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Reihl, Lori) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
