State of CA v. Azuma Corp., et al
| State of California |
| Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Darren Rose and Wendy Del Rosa |
| 2:2023cv00743 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for 17-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Motion for Preliminary Injunction re #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Wendy Del Rosa, Darren Rose. Attorney Narvaez, Gregory Michael added. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Narvaez, Gregory) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by State of California. Motion Hearing set for 7/21/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Declaration of Moliki Alexander, #4 Declaration of James Dahlen, #5 Declaration of Peter F. Nascenzi)(Nascenzi, Peter) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Date by Which Response to Complaint by Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Wendy Del Rosa, Darren Rose. Attorney Peebles, John M. added. (Peebles, John) Modified on 6/12/2023 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 11 AMENDED CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by State of California re #7 , #8 , #9 , #10 Waiver of Service Executed. (Goodwin, David) Modified on 5/18/2023 (Rodriguez, E). |
| Filing 10 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Azuma Corporation on 4/20/2023, Answer due 6/20/2023 (Goodwin, David) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Wendy Del Rosa on 4/20/2023, Answer due 6/20/2023 (Goodwin, David) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Phillip Del Rosa on 4/20/2023, Answer due 6/20/2023 (Goodwin, David) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Darren Rose on 4/20/2023, Answer due 6/20/2023 (Goodwin, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by James Vincent Hart on behalf of State of California. Attorney Hart, James Vincent added. (Hart, James) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by David C. Goodwin on behalf of State of California. Attorney Goodwin, David C. added. (Goodwin, David) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2023 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Wendy Del Rosa, Darren Rose* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Peter F. Nascenzi* *California Attorney General's Office* *1300 I St, Ste 125* *Sacramento, CA 95814-2951*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by State of California. (Nascenzi, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants by State of California. Attorney Nascenzi, Peter F. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10815915) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Nascenzi, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
