(PC) Ricalls v. Andrew
James Leonard Ricalls |
P Andrew and P. Andrew |
2:2023cv00771 |
April 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/9/2023 DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend within 30 days. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action for the reasons stated herein. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on James Leonard Ricalls. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A) |
RECEIPT number 200000603 for $402.00 for James Leonard Ricalls from State of CA. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on James Leonard Ricalls. (Perdue, C.) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Perdue, C.) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against P Andrew by James Leonard Ricalls.(Perdue, C.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.