(SS) Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Marcus Anthony Miller
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2023cv00885
Filed: May 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar)
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Oscar Gonzalez de Llano, GOVT for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service terminated (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar)
May 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 8/18/2023. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Perdue, C.)
May 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *90* days. Attorney *Kamaria Yaminah Davis* *Leibovic Law Group, LLP* *21540 Plummer St Suite B* *Chatsworth, CA 91311*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Perdue, C.)
May 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/17/2023 GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons and complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Perdue, C.)
May 12, 2023 Opinion or Order APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Reader, L)
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Marcus Anthony Miller. (Davis, Kamaria)
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Marcus Anthony Miller. (Davis, Kamaria)
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Marcus Anthony Miller (Davis, Kamaria)
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Marcus Anthony Miller. Attorney Davis, Kamaria Yaminah added.(Davis, Kamaria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Anthony Miller
Represented By: Kamaria Yaminah Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Represented By: Oscar Gonzalez de Llano, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?