Padilla et al v. Ford Motor Co
| Salvador Padilla and Denise Padilla |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2023cv00921 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| William B Shubb |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/30/2023 VACATING the 9/11/2023 Status Conference and SETTING the following deadlines: Initial Disclosures due by 10/11/2023; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 5/20/2024; Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by 6/17/2024; Discovery due by 7/15/2024; Motions to Compel Discovery Noticed before the Magistrate Judge no later than 9/9/2024; All Motions except Continuances, TRO or Emergency Applications filed by 7/15/2024; Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/18/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; and Jury Trial set for 1/14/2025 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb.(Donati, J)
|
| Filing 18 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Denise Padilla, Salvador Padilla. (Amarkarian, Allen) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER re Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/7/2023: Plaintiffs having moved to withdraw their motion to remand this action to state court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to remand #10 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to withdraw #15 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED AS MOOT. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
| Filing 15 WITHDRAWAL of #10 Motion to Remand, filed by Denise Padilla, Salvador Padilla. (Amarkarian, Allen) |
| Filing 14 REPLY by Denise Padilla, Salvador Padilla re #10 Motion to Remand,. (Amarkarian, Allen) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE to RESCHEDULE HEARING on #10 Motion to Remand, : Motion Hearing set for 8/7/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Amarkarian, Allen) |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION by Ford Motor Company to #10 Motion to Remand,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Proof of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY): The parties are hereby notified that #10 Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand has been noticed on an unavailable motion date. The motion will be heard on 8/7/2023 at 01:30 PM before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Counsel for plaintiffs is instructed to immediately file and serve an amended notice of motion (only) setting forth the above-referenced date and time, or the motion may be stricken. The parties are further instructed to review Judge Shubb's "Standard Information" on the court's website at www.caed.ucourts.gov at www.caed.ucourts.gov for available hearing dates prior to filing any motions. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to REMAND by Denise Padilla, Salvador Padilla. Motion Hearing set for 7/24/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Allen Amarkarian, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Proposed Order)(Amarkarian, Allen) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/11/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-00921- WBS-JDP. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Hugret, Spencer Peter added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Katherine P. Vilchez on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Vilchez, Katherine P. added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Vilchez, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Trina M. Clayton on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court of California, case number 34-2023-00336357 by Ford Motor Company. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10863174) (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Attorney, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
