Tafta v. Mayorkas et al
| Daniel Aurel Tafta |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and Danielle Lehman |
| 2:2023cv00951 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE as to All Defendants. (Lehrman, Douglas) Modified on 6/15/2023 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Ur M. Jaddou,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Ted H. Kim,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Danielle Lehman,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Alejandro Mayorkas (Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/10/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Danielle Lehman, Alejandro Mayorkas* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Douglas M. Lehrman, I* *Law Offices of Douglas M. Lehrman* *2020 Hurley Way Ste. 105* *Sacramento, CA 95825*. (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Daniel Aurel Tafta. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10870889) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lehrman, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
