Boatman et al v. Brockman et al
| Nathanael Boatman and Rachael Weinbrecht |
| Sarah Ellen Brockman and United States Postal Service |
| 2:2023cv01027 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/5/2023 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States Postal Service* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Tracy R. Horn* *Torklaw* *18650 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 300* *Irvine, CA 92612*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sarah Ellen Brockman* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tracy R. Horn* *Torklaw* *18650 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 300* *Irvine, CA 92612*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Nathanael Boatman, Rachael Weinbrecht (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Rachael Weinbrecht, Nathanael Boatman. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10878264) (Horn, Tracy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
