(HC) Franklin v. Pfeiffer
| Christopher Franklin |
| Unknown and C. Pfeiffer |
| 2:2023cv01039 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/20/23 GRANTING #10 Motion to Amend the Complaint and DIRECTING the Petitioner to file a amended petition within 30 days from the date of this order. The #8 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order and petition for writ of habeas corpus served on Christopher Franklin. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 11
OBJECTIONS to #8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Petitioner Christopher Franklin. (Lopez, K)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to AMEND the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and REQUEST for Clarification of IFP by Christopher Franklin. (Clemente Licea, O)
|
|
Filing 9
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Copy of Petition served on Tami Krenzin pursuant to #8 Order. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/29/2023 GRANTING petitioner's #3 , #6 motions for leave to proceed ifp and DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case, and to serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition on the CA Attorney General. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's #1 application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Assigned and referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (cc: Supervising Attorney General Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order, Findings and Recommendations served on Christopher Franklin. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE to #4 Order and Submission of IFP by Christopher Franklin. (Lopez, K)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher Franklin. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/12/2023 SUBSTITUTING C. Pfeiffer as respondent in this matter and ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. (Huang, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP Application served on Christopher Franklin. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 7/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Woodson, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Christopher Franklin. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher Franklin. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Unknown by Christopher Franklin.(Woodson, A) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/2/2023) (Woodson, A).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
