(SS) Turnbo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michael D. Turnbo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2023cv01399 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Allison Claire |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-1399 DJC AC (SS). (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Marcus, Meredith) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/19/23 GRANTING #3 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Meredith E. Marcus, PHV for Michael D. Turnbo. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Franco Becia for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service terminated (Becia, Franco) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 10/19/2023. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Harvey Sackett* *Sackett & Associates* *548 Market Street, Suite 38822* *San Francisco, California 94101*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Reader, L) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/17/2023 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons and complaint on the CSS. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue a Scheduling Order in this case. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement](Reader, L)
|
| Filing 3 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Michael D. Turnbo for attorney Meredith E. Marcus to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10958669) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Sackett, Harvey) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Michael D. Turnbo. (Sackett, Harvey) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security by Michael D. Turnbo. Attorney Sackett, Harvey Peter added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sackett, Harvey) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
