Gamez et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
Arecely Gamez and Jeffry Takili |
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor North America, Inc. |
2:2023cv01464 |
July 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Kendall J Newman |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy M. Francel for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/18/23: On 9/15/2023, the parties filed a #15 Stipulation modifying the briefing schedule on defendants' pending #13 motion to dismiss. Pursuant to the parties' #15 Stipulation, and good cause appearing, plaintiffs' shall file their opposition to defendants' pending #13 motion to dismiss no later than 10/13/2023 and defendants' shall file their reply in support of their pending #13 motion no later than 11/3/2023. (Text Only Entry) (Francel, M.) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Briefing Schedule by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation on Briefing Schedule)(Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 14 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. in re #13 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 13 MOTION to DISMISS by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/21/2023 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/28/2023: On 8/25/2023, plaintiff filed a #11 first amended complaint in this action. In light of the #11 first amended complaint superseding the #1 original complaint, the pending #6 Motion to Dismiss the original complaint is hereby denied, without prejudice, as having been rendered moot.(Buzo, P) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. by Arecely Gamez, Jeffry Takili.(Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2023: The Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 12/12/2023 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Dale A. Drozd is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the setting of an Initial Scheduling Conference is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge. The parties' shall file their joint scheduling report no later than fourteen (14) days before the new Initial Scheduling Conference date set before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Buzo, P) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy M. Woodworth for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/14/2023: On 8/11/2023, the parties in this action filed a #8 stipulation for a proposed briefing schedule as to defendants' pending #6 motion to dismiss. Pursuant to the #8 stipulation, and good cause appearing, plaintiffs shall file their opposition to defendants' #6 motion, or a first amended complaint ("FAC"), no later than 8/25/2023. Unless plaintiffs elect to file a FAC, defendants shall file their reply in support of their pending #6 motion no later than 9/8/2023. If plaintiffs elect to file a FAC, defendants shall file their response to it no later than 9/15/2023. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending #6 motion to dismiss is SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 9/19/2023 is VACATED, to be reset at a later date if the court determines that oral argument is needed.(Text Only Entry) (Woodworth, M.) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Continuance re #6 Motion to Dismiss by Arecely Gamez, Jeffry Takili. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/31/23 GRANTING #5 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Christopher S. Dodrill for Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Defendants. Motion Hearing SET for 9/19/2023 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Herrington, Robert) Modified on 8/1/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. for attorney Christopher S. Dodrill to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10983250) (Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Civil New Case Documents for DAD. (Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/12/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Herrington, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 23CV001477 by All Defendants. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10975083) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herrington, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.