Forward, Inc. v. State of CA et al
| Forward, Inc. |
| State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and California Department of General Services |
| 2:2023cv01567 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/21/2023: On 9/20/2023, the parties filed a #10 stipulation to extend the time for defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") and Department of General Services ("DGS") to respond to plaintiff's complaint. Pursuant to the #10 stipulation and good cause appearing, defendants CDCR and DGS shall file a response to plaintiff's complaint no later than 10/23/2023.(Buzo, P) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of ERRATA by California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Department of General Services re #10 Stipulation and Proposed Order.. (Hungerford, Sean) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Department of General Services. Attorney Hungerford, Sean K. added. (Hungerford, Sean) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/28/2023 ORDERING that an Initial Scheduling Conference is SET for 12/1/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before 11/17/2023. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2023: The Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 12/12/2023 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Dale A. Drozd is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the setting of an Initial Scheduling Conference is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge. The parties' shall file their joint scheduling report no later than fourteen (14) days before the new Initial Scheduling Conference date set before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Buzo, P) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Department of General Services, State of California. Attorney Fisher, Jeffrey Thomas added. (Fisher, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Scheduling Conference by Forward, Inc. (Bruen, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/12/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Department of General Services, State of California* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Erik Reinertson* *Law Office of T. Bruen* *1990 N. California Blvd. Suite 20* *Walnut Creek, CA 94596*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Forward, Inc.: Notice of Pending Action. (Bruen, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Forward, Inc. (Bruen, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Forward, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10987896) (Bruen, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
