(SS) Sandoval v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sonia Rosita Sandoval |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2023cv01635 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Olsen, Edward Alan added. (Attachments: #1 Certified Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process, #4 Payment Documents, #5 Jurisdictional Documents, #6 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Disability Related Development, #8 Medical Records Part 1, #9 Medical Records Part 2, #10 Medical Records Part 3, #11 Administrative Record in OCR Format (Pages 1-1500), #12 Administrative Record in OCR Format (Pages 1501-2468))(Olsen, Edward) |
Filing 7
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/23/2023: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 2:23-cv-1635 JDP. (Benson, A.)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Edwards, L.) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney L. Jamala Edwards for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service and US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service terminated (Edwards, L.) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Shapiro, Brian) |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 11/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Licea Chavez, V)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Brian C. Shapiro* *Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing* *12631 East Imperial Highway Suite C-115* *Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security by Sonia Rosita Sandoval. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11007419) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification of interested parties)(Shapiro, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
