Aguero et al v. Ford Motor Co.
| Marisa Aguero and Jameson Aguero |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2023cv01642 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by M York Courtroom Deputy for Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/04/2023 GRANTING #11 Joint Request and EXTENDING the deadline to file dispositional documents to 11/13/2023. (York, M) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REQUEST for EXTENSION of Deadline for Dispositional Documents by Ford Motor Company. (Clayton, Trina) Modified on 10/5/2023 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by M York Courtroom Deputy for Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/15/2023: The Court has been advised by counsel that this action has SETTLED. See ECF No. #9 . Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to file dispositional documents no later than 10/10/2023, in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160. Additionally, any hearing dates and deadlines previously set in this matter, including the 09/21/2023 due date for the Joint Status Report, are VACATED. (York, M) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of JOINT SETTLEMENT by Ford Motor Company. Dispositional Docs due by 10/10/2023. (Clayton, Trina) Modified on 9/18/2023 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by M York Courtroom Deputy for Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/22/2023: The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and 26, in accordance with Local Rule 240 and the Court's Order Requiring Service of Process and Joint Status Report, within thirty (30) days. (York, M) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Jameson Aguero, Marisa Aguero. (David, Chad) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Hugret, Spencer Peter added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Katherine P. Vilchez on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Vilchez, Katherine P. added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Vilchez, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Trina M. Clayton on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 23CV003729 by Ford Motor Company. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11007728) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Trina M. Clayton, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H-Answer, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Certification of Interested Entities, #13 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
