Naimee et al v. Roadtex Transportation Corp. et al
| Ahmad Naimee and Diogenes M Sanchez Gomez |
| Roadtex Transportation Corp., Roadtex Warehouse Services Corp, Roadtex Transportation Corporation, RDTX Transportation, Inc. and Echo Global Logistics, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv01714 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER by Echo Global Logistics, Inc., RDTX Transportation, Inc., Roadtex Transportation Corp., Roadtex Transportation Corporation, Roadtex Warehouse Services Corp. Attorney Moses, Evan R. added.(Moses, Evan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Echo Global Logistics, Inc., RDTX Transportation, Inc., Roadtex Transportation Corp., Roadtex Transportation Corporation, Roadtex Warehouse Services Corp* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joshua H. Watson* *Clayeo C. Arnold, APC* *865 Howe Avenue* *Sacramento, CA 95825*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Ahmad Naimee, Diogenes M Sanchez Gomez. Attorney Watson, Joshua H. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11015187) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Watson, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
