(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
| Daniel Rodriguez Quintero |
| Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow |
| 2:2023cv01719 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:23-cv-1719-CKD) to Fresno (1:23-cv-1233-SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/18/2023. (Huang, H)
|
| INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to Fresno Division. New Case Number 1:23-cv-1233-SAB. Old Case Number 2:23-cv-1719-CKD. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/14/2023*. Consent or Decline due by 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Nair, Christopher) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Daniel Rodriguez Quintero. (Nair, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Daniel Rodriguez Quintero. (Nair, Christopher) (Huang, H). |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Tristan Lemon, Oxborrow by Daniel Rodriguez Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nair, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
