ALO, LLC v. Alori, LLC
Plaintiff: ALO, LLC
Defendant: Alori, LLC and Envision Cosmetics, LLC
Case Number: 2:2023cv01741
Filed: August 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Jeremy D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2023 Filing 7 [DISREGARDED] SEE #6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Asad Karamally on behalf of ALO, LLC. (Karamally, Asad) Modified on 8/30/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
August 28, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Asad Karamally on behalf of ALO, LLC. Attorney Karamally, Asad added. (Karamally, Asad)
August 28, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/28/2023: The Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 1/9/2024 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Dale A. Drozd is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the setting of an Initial Scheduling Conference is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge. The parties' shall file their joint scheduling report no later than fourteen (14) days before the new Initial Scheduling Conference date set before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Buzo, P)
August 17, 2023 Filing 4 TRADEMARK NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Trademark #1:* 3,875,869 * * 11/16/10 * * ALO,LLC * Trademark #2:* 4,519,311 * * 04/22/14 * * ALO, LLC * Trademark #3:* 5,172,308 * * 03/28/17 * * ALO, LLC * Trademark #4:* 5,172,309 * * 03/28/17 * * ALO, LLC * Trademark #5:* 5,597,575 * * 10/30/18 * * ALO, LLC *; copy of Complaint and Trademark Report emailed to U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 Trademark Report, #4 VDRP) (Benson, A.)
August 17, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Alori, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael D. Adams* *Rutan & Tucker LLP* *18575 Jamboree Rd., 9th Floor* *Irvine, CA 92612*. (Benson, A.)
August 16, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by ALO, LLC (Adams, Michael)
August 16, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alori, LLC by ALO, LLC. Attorney Adams, Michael D. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11020960) (Attachment(s): #1 Report for Determination) (Adams, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALO, LLC v. Alori, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alori, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Envision Cosmetics, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALO, LLC
Represented By: Asad Karamally
Represented By: Michael D. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?