Dula v. Idexx Distribution, Inc.
| Marnelle Mac Dula |
| Idexx Distribution, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv01819 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Morrison C England |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPLY by Idexx Distribution, Inc. re #14 Reply. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Carla Savino)(Wende, Kyle) |
Filing 15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/9/2023 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall have until fifteen (15) days after the Court's issuance of a ruling on the Motion to Remand to file a First Amended Complaint. Defendant shall have until thirty (30) days after Plaintiff files an amended Complaint or forty-five (45) days after the Court has issued its ruling on the Motion to Remand, whichever is sooner, to file a responsive pleading. Defendant shall meet and confer with Plaintiff regarding the sufficiency of her draft First Amended Complaint within fifteen (15) days of this stipulation being signed. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY by Marnelle Mac Dula re #10 Motion to Remand. (Berzin, Brittany) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extend Time for Defendant IDEXX Distribution, Inc. To File A Responsive Pleading by Marnelle Mac Dula. (Berzin, Brittany) |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION by Idexx Distribution, Inc. to #10 Motion to Remand. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Declaration of Lauren Grass, #2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Wende, Kyle) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the 11/2/2023 hearing on the Motion to Remand the Action to State Court #10 is VACATED and the motion is SUBMITTED without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(c)-(d). If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to REMAND the Action to State Court by Marnelle Mac Dula. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Memorandum, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service)(Berzin, Brittany) Modified on 9/25/2023 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 9 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Donati, J) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-1819 MCE CKD. (Donati, J) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Berzin, Brittany) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of FILING with Sacramento Superior Court in Compliance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(d) by Idexx Distribution, Inc.. (Wende, Kyle) Modified on 9/5/2023 (Donati, J). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/1/2023 ORDERING #4 that the Parties agree that Defendant has until 10/16/2023 to respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff will provide a draft First Amended Complaint to Defendant by 9/15/2023.(Reader, L)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant IDEXX Distribution, Inc. To File A Responsive Pleading by Marnelle Mac Dula. (Berzin, Brittany) Modified on 9/1/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Idexx Distribution, Inc. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for Magistrate as Presider, #1 Notice of Removal,. (Wende, Kyle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 23CV005044 by Idexx Distribution, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11039782) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Lauren Grass, #3 Declaration Of Lily J. Lu, #4 Declaration of Kyle A. Wende, #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Wende, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dula v. Idexx Distribution, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marnelle Mac Dula | |
| Represented By: | Galen T. Shimoda |
| Represented By: | Brittany V. Berzin |
| Represented By: | Justin Paul Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Idexx Distribution, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alexandra M. Asterlin |
| Represented By: | Kyle Wende |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
