(PC) Ross v. CDCR et al
| Malcolm Ray Ross |
| CDCR, Deuel Vocational Institution and State of California |
| 2:2023cv01920 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Malcolm Ray Ross. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing 10
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Copy of IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Prison Account of Malcolm Ray Ross signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/13/2023. The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's ifp on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/12/2023 GRANTING the #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DENYING the #5 Request for Status as moot. Within 30 days, Plaintiff must either file an amended complaint or advise the court that he wishes to stand by his current complaint. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order and New Complaint form served on Malcolm Ray Ross. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Malcolm Ray Ross. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 7
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Malcolm Ray Ross. (Woodson, A)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for Malcolm Ray Ross, CDCR No. AN-8902, to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST for STATUS of CASE by Malcolm Ray Ross. (Nair, C) [Response Sent: The Court will notify you as soon as any action is taken in your case.] Modified on 9/28/2023 (Huang, H).
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Murphy, J)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Nair, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Malcolm Ray Ross. (Nair, C)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Malcolm Ray Ross. (Nair, C)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against CDCR, Deuel Vocational Institution, State of California by Malcolm Ray Ross. (Nair, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
