Jaquez v. Site Safety Traffic Safety and Signs
| Gerardo Jaquez |
| Site Safety Traffic Safety and Signs |
| 2:2023cv01933 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT filed by Gerardo Jaquez. (Tunyan, Lilit) |
| Filing 8 MINUTES FOR MOTION HEARING held before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/26/2023. L. Tunyan appeared for Plaintiff. R. Barnum appeared for Defendant. The Court SUBMITTED Plaintiff's #3 Motion to Remand. Order to issue. Court Reporter: R. Alvarez - ECRO. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/17/2023: The parties' Joint Request for Remote Appearance, ECF No. #6 , is DENIED. In lieu of appearing in person, the parties may file a joint request to waive appearance and oral argument, no less than one week before the hearing, after which the matter will be submitted under Local Rule 230(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 6 JOINT REQUEST FOR REMOTE APPEARANCE by Gerardo Jaquez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tunyan, Lilit) |
| Filing 5 REPLY by Gerardo Jaquez re #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Opposition to Motion, #3 Motion to Remand, #2 Civil New Case Documents for DJC. (Tunyan, Lilit) |
| Filing 4 OPPOSITION by Site Safety Traffic Safety and Signs to #3 Motion to Remand,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Barnum, Randal) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to REMAND this case to Superior Court by Gerardo Jaquez. Motion Hearing SET for 10/26/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (DJC) before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lilit Tunyan, #2 Proposed Order)(Tunyan, Lilit) Modified on 9/22/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Donati, J) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Solano County Superior Court, case number CU23-00940 by Site Safety Traffic Safety and Signs. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11063124) (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service )(Barnum, Randal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jaquez v. Site Safety Traffic Safety and Signs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gerardo Jaquez | |
| Represented By: | Lilit Tunyan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Site Safety Traffic Safety and Signs | |
| Represented By: | Randal M. Barnum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
