(PS) Hatton v. Nevada County Behavioral Health et al
| Donald James Bruce Hatton, Sr |
| Nevada County Behavioral Health, Nevada County Public Guardian, Siena Kindred Health Care, Siena Nursing Staff, Kim Quiznot, Maggie McDermott and Admission Discharge Staff |
| 2:2023cv01970 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing 3
[DISREGARD- pursuant to change in case designation] PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Murphy, J) Modified on 9/22/2023 (Donati, J).
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Donald James Bruce Hatton Sr. (Murphy, J)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Donald James Bruce Hatton, Sr. (Murphy, J)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Admission Discharge Staff, Maggie McDermott, Nevada County Behavioral Health, Nevada County Public Guardian, Kim Quiznot, Siena Kindred Health Care, Siena Nursing Staff by Donald James Bruce Hatton, Sr.(Murphy, J)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
