Faria v. PNC Bank National Assoc., et al.,
| Michael A. Faria and Nanette M. Faria |
| PNC Bank National Association and SN Servicing Corporation |
| 2:2023cv02023 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/2023: The district judge has referred the initial scheduling conference to Judge Newman. (ECF No. 21 ) The court concurs that the case is not ripe for scheduling, given the scope of the pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. #15 ). Should this case proceed beyond the dismissal stage, thus requiring an answer from defendants, the parties are directed to notice a hearing for scheduling, at least 14 days out, before the magistrate judge, and shall also submit a joint statement responding to Judge Drozd's "Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference." Judge Newman hears civil motions on Tuesdays at 9:00 a.m. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Waldrop, A) |
| Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/9/2023: The Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 1/23/2024 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Dale A. Drozd is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the setting of an Initial Scheduling Conference is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge. The parties' shall file their joint scheduling report no later than fourteen (14) days before the new Initial Scheduling Conference date set before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Buzo, P) |
| Filing 20 REPLY by SN Servicing Corporation in SUPPORT of #18 Opposition #15 Motion to Dismiss. Attorney Adams, Kellen added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Adams, Kellen) Modified on 11/6/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Michael A. Faria, Nanette M. Faria re #18 Opposition to Motion. (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION by Michael A. Faria, Nanette M. Faria to #15 Motion to Dismiss. (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant SN Servicing Corporation. (Witcher, Rachel) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of FILING BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to Plaintiffs Michael Faria and Nannette Faria by SN Servicing Corporation (Witcher, Rachel) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to DISMISS by SN Servicing Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 11/21/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Certificate of Service)(Witcher, Rachel) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of defendant PNC Bank, National Association by Michael A. Faria, Nanette M. Faria. (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) Modified on 10/4/2023 (Benson, A.). |
Filing 13
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/30/2023 re #6 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER filed by Michael A. Faria, #10 Request for Judicial Notice filed by SN Servicing Corporation. IT IS ORDERED: Defendant SN Servicing Corporation's request for judicial notice #10 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's ex parte #6 Motion for TRO is DENIED. (Buzo, P)
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by SN Servicing Corporation re #10 Request for Judicial Notice, #9 Opposition to Motion, #11 Declaration. Attorney Witcher, Rachel C. added. Attorney Witcher, Rachel C. added as counsel of record. (Witcher, Rachel) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of William Fogelman in support of #9 Opposition. (Witcher, Rachel) Modified on 10/2/2023 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by SN Servicing Corporation in re #9 Opposition to Motion. (Witcher, Rachel) |
| Filing 9 OPPOSITION by SN Servicing Corporation to #6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Attorney Witcher, Rachel C. added. (Witcher, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/28/2023: Having reviewed the pending #6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, the court orders that any opposition to the pending #6 motion that defendants wish to file must be submitted no later than 9/29/2023 at 9:00AM. (Buzo, P) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER re #6 Motion for TRO. (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) Modified on 10/2/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 6 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Michael A. Faria. (Attachments: #1 TRO Checklist)(Rahimzadeh, Yasha) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: PNC Bank National Association served on 9/19/2023. (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: SN Servicing Corporation served on 9/19/2023. (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/23/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *PNC Bank National Association, SN Servicing Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Yasha Rahimzadeh* *Law Offices of Yasha Rahimzadeh* *980 Ninth St., PMB 1021* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by All Plaintiffs. Attorney Rahimzadeh, Yasha added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11081935) (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rahimzadeh, Yasha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
