(PS) Rigor v. Santa Clara County Public Defenders Office
Soraya Maria Rigor |
Santa Clara County Public Defenders Office, Santa Clara County District Attorneys Office, United States Department of Justice and State of California Attorney General |
2:2023cv02146 |
September 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Kendall J Newman |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/6/2023 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. RECOMMENDING that the action be dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd, and Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's.(Reader, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and Findings and Recommendations, served on Soraya Maria Rigor. (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Soraya Maria Rigor. (Lopez, K) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Santa Clara County District Attorneys Office, Santa Clara County Public Defenders Office, State of California Attorney General, United States Department of Justice by Soraya Maria Rigor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lopez, K) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Lopez, K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.