(HC) Barton v. Superior Court of San Joaquin County
Petitioner: William Barton
Respondent: Superior Court of San Joaquin County
Case Number: 2:2023cv02176
Filed: October 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/29/2023 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action and GRANTING #6 Motion to Proceed IFP. District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney for all further proceedings. It is further RECOMMENDED that the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be summarily dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. New Case Number: 2:23-cv-02176 TLN CKD (HC). (Lopez, K)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on William Barton. (Lopez, K)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William Barton. (Woodson, A)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by William Barton. (Woodson, A)
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/01/2023 DIRECTING Petitioner to submit an IFP Application or the appropriate filing fee within 30 days from the date of this Order.(Lopez, K)
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP Application served on William Barton. (Lopez, K)
October 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Clemente Licea, O)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 11/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Clemente Licea, O)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William Barton. (Clemente Licea, O)
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Superior Court of San Joaquin County by William Barton. (Clemente Licea, O)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Barton v. Superior Court of San Joaquin County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Barton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superior Court of San Joaquin County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?