(PS) Dowglas v. Metro Goldwyn - Mayer
An Jon Marquis Dowglas |
Metro Goldwyn - Mayer and Amazon |
2:2023cv02245 |
October 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Allison Claire |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/27/23 RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Licea Chavez, V) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Findings and Recommendations served on An Jon Marquis Dowglas. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT by An Jon Marquis Dowglas to #1 Complaint. (Murphy, J) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/13/23 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING Plaintiff to file 30 days from the date of this order, an amended complaint. (Licea Chavez, V) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on An Jon Marquis Dowglas. (Licea Chavez, V) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by An Jon Marquis Dowglas. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by An Jon Marquis Dowglas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kastilahn, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.