(SS) Greyeagle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Richard Greyeagle |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2023cv02317 |
October 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/1/2023: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 2:23-CV-2317 CKD.(Reader, L) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Vieira, Christopher) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Vieira, Christopher) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Christopher Vieira for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service and US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service terminated (Vieira, Christopher) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 1/19/2024. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Reader, L) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Lawrence D. Rohlfing* *Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rahlfing, Inc.,CPC* *12631 E. Imperial Hwy, Suite C-115* *Santa Fe Springs, California 90670*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/18/2023 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons and complaint on the CSS. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement] (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Richard Greyeagle. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Richard Greyeagle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification of interested parties)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.