Budd v. Vision Service Plan
Plaintiff: Brian Budd
Defendant: Vision Service Plan
Case Number: 2:2023cv02335
Filed: October 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Referring Judge: Dale A Drozd
2 Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2023 Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/7/2023: The assigned district judge has referred to the magistrate judge the initial scheduling conference. (See 2:23-cv-02334-DAD-KJN at ECF No. 12.) A review of the docket shows the complaints have been answered and no dispositive motions are pending. Thus, the cases appear ripe for scheduling. Therefore, the initial scheduling conference is reset for 1/23/2024 at 9:00 AM before Chief Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The hearing will be conducted remotely, and parties will receive instructions on how to appear as the hearing date approaches. The parties are directed to meet and confer within 30 days of this order, then submit a joint statement at least 14 days prior to the hearing responding to the relevant portion of Judge Drozd's "Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference." (See 2:23-cv-02334-DAD-KJN at ECF No. 3 at par. 6(a)-(o).) (Text Only Entry) (Waldrop, A)
December 7, 2023 Filing 15 ANSWER by Vision Service Plan.(Asterlin, Alexandra)
November 15, 2023 Filing 14 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney George James Theofanis,Robert R. Vorhees for Vision Service Plan (Asterlin, Alexandra)
November 15, 2023 Filing 13 JOINT STIPULATION for extension of time to Respond to Complaint by Vision Service Plan. Attorney Asterlin, Alexandra M. added. (Asterlin, Alexandra) Modified on 11/17/2023 (Reader, L).
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/2/2023 RELATING and REASSIGNING CASES 2:23-cv-2334, 2:23-cv-2335 and 2:23-cv-2500 to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes no longer associated. New Case Number: 2:23-cv-2335 DAD KJN. (Clemente Licea, O)
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/1/2023 GRANTING #8 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Marc R. Edelman, to appear for Brian Budd. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Reader, L)
October 31, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:23-cv-02334-DB, 2:23-cv-02500-DJC-AC by Brian Budd. (Rattet, Allison)
October 30, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Vision Service Plan served on 10/26/2023, answer due 11/16/2023. (Rattet, Allison)
October 26, 2023 Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Brian Budd for attorney Marc R. Edelman to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number CCAEDC-11151368)Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Rattet, Allison) Modified on 10/27/2023 (Benson, A.).
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/25/2023 GRANTING #4 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney George G. Triantis, PHV for Brian Budd. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Lopez, K)
October 23, 2023 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of GOOD STANDING by Brian Budd re #4 PHV. (Rattet, Allison) Modified on 10/24/2023 (Benson, A.).
October 17, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of GOOD STANDING by Brian Budd re #4 PHV (Rattet, Allison) Modified on 10/18/2023 (Clemente Licea, O).
October 17, 2023 Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Brian Budd for attorney George G. Triantis to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-11133883) (Rattet, Allison)
October 16, 2023 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 16, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Vision Service Plan* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Allison M. Rattet* *Morgan and Morgan* *8151 Peters Rd. Suite 4000* *Plantation, FL 33324*. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 16, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vision Service Plan by Brian Budd. Attorney Rattet, Allison M. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11132282) (Attachments: #1 E-Filing Notice A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rattet, Allison)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Budd v. Vision Service Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Budd
Represented By: Allison M. Rattet
Represented By: George Triantis, PHV
Represented By: Marc Reed Edelman, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vision Service Plan
Represented By: Alexandra M. Asterlin
Represented By: George James Theofanis
Represented By: Robert R. Vorhees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?