Heard v. Ford Motor Co.
| Justin Aaron Heard |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2023cv02397 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Megan Cooney on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Cooney, Megan added. (Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-02397 DAD AC. (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Keledjian, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of FILING #1 Notice of Removal with Superior Court by Ford Motor Company. (Smith, Katherine) Modified on 10/25/2023 (Clemente Licea, O). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #3 Civil New Case Documents for Magistrate as Presider. (Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
| RECEIPT number ACAEDC-11142967 for $402.00 for Ford Motor Company from Smith, Katherine V.A.. (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) CIVSB2316694 by Ford Motor Company. (Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UOE-2023-9958 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Dharinidharan Subramaniam in Support, #3 Declaration of Katherine V.A. Smith in Support, #4 Notice of Interested Parties, #5 Proof of Service)(Smith, Katherine) ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heard v. Ford Motor Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Justin Aaron Heard | |
| Represented By: | David Keledjian |
| Represented By: | David Harmik Yeremian |
| Represented By: | Emil Davtyan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Katherine V.A. Smith |
| Represented By: | Megan Cooney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
