(PC) Hayes v. Beck et al
Lawrence P. Hayes |
Christopher Beck, Keith Pulsipher and Christine M. De Leo |
2:2023cv02694 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION For Leave to File Amended Pleading by Lawrence P. Hayes. (Nair, C) |
Filing 5 SECOND AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Lawrence P. Hayes.(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nair, C) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Nair, C) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Lawrence P. Hayes. (Nair, C) |
Filing 2 NOTICE re: In Forma Pauperis will be sent by Lawrence P. Hayes. (Nair, C) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Christopher Beck, Christine M. De Leo, Keith Pulsipher by Lawrence P. Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Nair, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.