(PS) Lopez v. Kandola
| Mirna Lopez |
| Akashdeep Kandola |
| 2:2023cv02856 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Allison Claire |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTES FOR HEARING held before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/19/2024. Plaintiff, M. Lopez, appeared pro se. B. Hansen appeared for Defendant. The Court DISSOLVED the Temporary Restraining Order filed in Sacramento County Superior Court. (cc: Operations Supervisor) Court Reporter: M. Valenoti. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to DISMISS by Akashdeep Kandola. Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Akashdeep Singh Kandola, #3 Certification of Federal Employment, #4 Appendix of Unpublished Authorities, #5 Proof of Service)(Hansen, Brendon)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 11 Minutes for Hearing served on Mirna Lopez. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE by Akashdeep Kandola to [ 4 ] Minute Order, #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Akashdeep Singh Kandola, #2 Certification of Federal Employment, #3 App'x of Unpublished Cases, #4 Proof of Service by Mail, #5 Proof of Service by Email)(Hansen, Brendon) Modified on 1/9/2024 (Reader, L).
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/5/2024: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. #6 , as filed, is defective. Defendant shall comply with Local Rule 302(c)(1) and re-notice the motion for hearing before the assigned Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the hearing set for 1/18/2024 is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Akashdeep Kandola re #6 Motion to Dismiss. (Hansen, Brendon) Modified on 1/9/2024 (Reader, L).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to DISMISS by Akashdeep Kandola. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (DJC) before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Akashdeep Singh Kandola, #3 Certification of Federal Employment, #4 Appendix of Unpublished Authorities, #5 Proof of Service)(Hansen, Brendon)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Minute Order served on Mirna López. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/12/23 GRANTING #3 Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for a Temporary Restraining Order Against Defendant. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Request by 1/12/24. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Mirna Lopez. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 12/8/2023: For present purposes the Court will construe the Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Order filed in Sacramento County Superior Court (ECF No. #1 at 6-15.) as a complaint. The Court notes that the Superior Court granted a temporary restraining order pending a hearing on Plaintiff's request for a restraining order. (ECF No. #1 at 24-26.) Defendant now requests an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's request for a restraining order. (ECF No. #3 .) Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. Defendant will have until January 5, 2024 to file a response to Plaintiff's request, which the Court has construed as a complaint. Plaintiff will be have until January 12, 2024 to file any reply to Defendant's response. This matter is SET for hearing on January 18, 2024 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 10 before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. The Superior Court's order remains in effect pending a hearing on the request or a motion to dissolve that order. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Minute Order served on Mirna Lopez. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing 3
EX PARTE APPLICATION by Akashdeep Kandola for to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for a Temporary Restraining Order. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Hansen, Brendon)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 23CH001332 by Akashdeep Kandola. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proof of Service)(Hansen, Brendon)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PS) Lopez v. Kandola | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mirna Lopez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Akashdeep Kandola | |
| Represented By: | Brendon Laurs Steffan Hansen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
