Canseco v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Marisol Canseco |
| Walmart Inc., Walmart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Sandra Doe, George Doe and Matthew Suekut |
| 2:2023cv02947 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/2024: Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. #13 ), the Court determined this case has settled. In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160, dispositional documents are to be filed on or before 4/1/2024. Accordingly, all other deadlines and hearings are VACATED, and the Court DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 12). Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of SETTLEMENT of ENTIRE CASE by Walmart Inc. Dispositional Docs due by 4/1/2024. (Conley, James) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/31/2024 ORDERING Counsel for Defendants to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 2/7/2024 as to why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. #10 ), pursuant to AMENDED Local Rule 230(c). Defendants shall file an opposition to the motion, or statement of non-opposition by 2/7/2024. Failure to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-opposition thereto and may result in a recommendation that Plaintiff's motion be granted. Plaintiff may file a reply brief to Defendants' opposition, if any, in accordance with AMENDED Local Rule 230(d). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/17/2024: On the Court's own motion, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. #10 ) is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 2/22/2024 is VACATED. If Court determines oral argument is necessary, it will be scheduled at a later date. All briefing shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(c) and (d). Plaintiff's Request to Appear Telephonically is DENIED as MOOT. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to REMAND by Marisol Canseco. Motion Hearing set for 2/22/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Request for Telephonic Appearance, #4 Proposed Order re Telephonic Appearance) (Kanani, Navid) Modified on 1/17/2024 (Krueger, M). |
| Filing 9 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-02947-TLN-KJN. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Conley, James) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kanani, Navid) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/3/2024: On 12/18/2023, defendant removed this case from state court, and this court assigned the case solely to the undersigned under Appendix A of the court's local rules. (ECF No. 1.) The initial scheduling order required each party to return the "Consent/Decline of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction" form to the Clerk within 14 days of removal from state court. (ECF No. 4 at par. 2.) A review of the docket indicates that no consent/decline form has been submitted. As noted on the consent/decline documents issued by the Clerk, the parties are not required to consent, but the parties' designations are required in order for the court to properly process any forthcoming issues (including, for example, a motion to remand or case scheduling order). Thus, any party who has not submitted its consent/decline designation shall do so within seven days of this order. Failure to submit a consent/decline designation will result in future delays in this case. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Waldrop, A) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart Inc., Walmart Stores East, LP. (Conley, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart Inc., Walmart Stores East, LP (Conley, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 23CV009829 by Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East LP, Wal-Mart Associated, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11247624) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Conley, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
