Ceja v. Ford Motor Co.
| Alfredo Ceja |
| Ford Motor Company and Future Ford of Sacramento |
| 2:2023cv02974 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 02/14/24 ORDERING: Initial Disclosures due by 3/4/24; Discovery due by 9/27/24; Designation of Expert Witnesses due 10/4/24; Rebuttal expert disclosures due by 10/18/24; Expert discovery due by 11/1/24; Joint Mid-Discovery Statement due by 03/22/24; Dispositive Motions filed by 1/10/25; Motions noticed for hearing 2/20/25 at 1:30 p.m.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/8/25 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (DJC) before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta; Jury Trial set for 7/7/25 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (DJC) before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 14 days OF this order. (Woodson, A)
|
| Filing 10 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Alfredo Ceja. (LaRocque, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (LaRocque, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Elizabeth A LaRocque on behalf of Alfredo Ceja. Attorney LaRocque, Elizabeth A added. (LaRocque, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #5 Civil New Case Documents for DJC. (Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Hugret, Spencer Peter added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Katherine P. Vilchez on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Vilchez, Katherine P. added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Vilchez, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Trina M. Clayton on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 23cv006893 by Ford Motor Company. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11252933) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Atty iso Removal, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Exhibit W, #25 Civil Cover Sheet, #26 Notice of Interested Parties, #27 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
