Simien v. Petal Card, Inc. et al
Gabriel Simien |
Petal Card, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC |
2:2023cv03042 |
December 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-3042-TLN-KJN. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 25 ANSWER by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Brooks, Jennifer) |
Filing 24 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Brooks, Jennifer) |
Filing 23 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (O'Connor, Courtney) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy A. Waldrop for Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/21/2024: This case was assigned to the magistrate judge under Appendix A sub. (m) of the court's Local Rules. In order for the court to administratively process any forthcoming motions or filings, the parties will need to submit their consent/decline forms regarding magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4-1.) The parties are under no obligation to consent, and under Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) a party's response is kept confidential. Accordingly, within 14 days of this order, any party who has yet to submit the consent/decline form at ECF No. 4-1 shall do so. (Text Only Entry) (Waldrop, A) |
Filing 21 ANSWER by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(O'Connor, Courtney) |
Filing 20 ANSWER by Trans Union LLC.(Long, Charlotte) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy E. Argento for Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/24 GRANTING the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time (ECF No. #15 ). Defendant Petal Card, Inc. shall have until 2/20/24 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Argento, E.) |
Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Trans Union LLC. (Long, Charlotte) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION For Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Initial Complaint, by Trans Union LLC. Attorney Long, Charlotte A. added. (Long, Charlotte) Modified on 1/26/2024 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 16 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Courtney P. O'Connor on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Attorney O'Connor, Courtney P. added. (O'Connor, Courtney) |
Filing 15 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to #1 Complaint by No More Than 28 Days, by Petal Card, Inc.. Attorney Givental, Alisa A. added. (Givental, Alisa) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/22/2024 EXTENDING the deadline for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint to 2/23/2024. (Clemente Licea, O) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Trans Union LLC served on 1/5/2024, answer due 1/26/2024. (Loker, Matthew) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 1/5/2024, answer due 1/26/2024. (Loker, Matthew) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Complaint by not more than 28 days, by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brooks, Jennifer) Modified on 1/22/2024 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Brooks, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jennifer R. Brooks on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. Attorney Brooks, Jennifer R. added. (Brooks, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Petal Card, Inc. served on 1/2/2024, answer due 1/23/2024. (Loker, Matthew) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 1/2/2024, answer due 1/23/2024. (Loker, Matthew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (O'Connor, Cheryl) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer Complaint [New Response Date: February 20, 2024] by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Attorney O'Connor, Cheryl L. added. (O'Connor, Cheryl) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Petal Card, Inc., Trans Union LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew M. Loker* *Loker Law, APC* *1303 East Grand Ave. Suite 101* *Arroyo Grande, CA 93420*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Gabriel Simien (Loker, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Gabriel Simien. Attorney Loker, Matthew M. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11264248) (Loker, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.