USA v. Approx. $53,950.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $53,950.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $6,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Adriana Jones |
| 2:2023mc00415 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/6/2023: On 12/5/2023, the parties filed a #1 Stipulation to extend the deadline for the United States to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant assets and/or obtain an indictment alleging that defendant assets are subject to forfeiture. Pursuant to that stipulation and 18 U.S.C. 983(a)(3)(A), the deadline is extended until 2/29/2024.(Buzo, P) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Minute Order served on Michael Elsner NCAED. (Buzo, P) |
| Filing 1 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture by United States of America. Attorney Khasigian, Kevin Christopher added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Khasigian, Kevin) |
| NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Forfeiture. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
