Jimenez v. Buttigieg
Plaintiff: Mark Jimenez
Defendant: Secretary USDOT Pete Buttigieg
Case Number: 2:2024at01022
Filed: August 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2024 Filing 1 INTERVENOR COMPLAINT by Mark Jimenez. Attorney Ortiz, Jesse added., PETITION to ENFORCE IRS SUMMONS by Mark Jimenez. Attorney Ortiz, Jesse added., COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Mark Jimenez. Attorney Ortiz, Jesse added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ortiz, Jesse)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jimenez v. Buttigieg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary USDOT Pete Buttigieg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Jimenez
Represented By: Jesse Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?