Roberts v. Propak Logistics, LLC
| Kyle Roberts |
| Propak Logistics, LLC |
| 2:2024cv00008 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Propak Logistics, LLC. (Jenkins, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 9 [DISREGARD; no image attached - see #10 Amended Civil New Case Documents Issued] AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Michel, G.) Modified on 1/5/2024 (Michel, G.). |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/5/2024 RELATING case 2:23-cv-2534 DJC JDP and REASSIGNING case to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota no longer assigned to case. New Case Number: 2:24-cv-0008 DJC JDP. (cc DMC) (cc JDP) (cc DJC) (Clemente Licea, O)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rose, Adam) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:23-cv-02534-DJC-JDP by Propak Logistics, LLC. (Aragon, Rebecca) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Nathaniel Howard Jenkins on behalf of Propak Logistics, LLC. Attorney Jenkins, Nathaniel Howard added. (Jenkins, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 4 CORRECTED PROOF OF SERVICE re Removal documents by Propak Logistics, LLC. (Aragon, Rebecca) Modified on 1/3/2024 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:23-cv-02534-DJC-JDP by Propak Logistics, LLC. (Aragon, Rebecca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tehama County Superior Court, case number 23CI-000324 by Propak Logistics, LLC. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11266534) (Attachments: #1 Declaration Nathaniel Jenkins, #2 Declaration John Cooley, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Statement Corporate Disclosure, #5 Notice of Interested Parties, #6 Proof of Service)(Aragon, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roberts v. Propak Logistics, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kyle Roberts | |
| Represented By: | Adam Rose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Propak Logistics, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel Howard Jenkins |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Maria Aragon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
