Decker v. County of Sacramento, et al
| Brian Decker |
| County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office, Scott R. Jones, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Robert Duggan, City of Rancho Cordova, City of Rancho Cordova Police Department, Brandon M. Luke, George Parsons and Jeff Couch |
| 2:2024cv00021 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 2/2/2024 DIRECTING defendants to respond to the #1 First Amended Complaint by 3/7/2024. (Woodson, A)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Alison Jill Southard on behalf of Jeff Couch, Brandon M. Luke, George Parsons. Attorney Southard, Alison Jill added. (Southard, Alison) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jonathan B. Paul on behalf of County of Sacramento, Scott R. Jones, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office. Attorney Paul, Jonathan B. added. (Paul, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jonathan B. Paul on behalf of County of Sacramento. Attorney Paul, Jonathan B. added. (Paul, Jonathan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Eric Schultz on behalf of Robert Duggan, Sacramento Municipal Utility District. Attorney Schultz, Jeffrey Eric added. (Schultz, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 [DISREGARD; duplicate - see #8 Notice of Appearance] NOTICE of APPEARANCE by John Stuart Poulos on behalf of Robert Duggan, Sacramento Municipal Utility District. (Schultz, Jeffrey) Modified on 2/2/2024 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by John Stuart Poulos on behalf of Robert Duggan, Sacramento Municipal Utility District. Attorney Poulos, John Stuart added. (Poulos, John) |
| Filing 7 [DISREGARD; noncompliant - see E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(a)(1) & (2)] STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to respond to the Complaint by City of Rancho Cordova. (Southard, Alison) Modified on 2/2/2024 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 6 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:24-cv-00021-DJC-AC. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Southard, Alison) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by City of Rancho Cordova. Attorney Camy, William E. added. (Camy, William) Modified on 1/10/2024 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2021-00310830 by City of Rancho Cordova. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number BCAEDC-11270898) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Southard, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
