Condrashoff et al v. General Motors LLC
Plaintiff: George W. Condrashoff and Benita Gwyn Asher
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv00108
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Referring Judge: Dale A Drozd
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2024 Filing 8 REPLY by General Motors LLC to RESPONSE in Support of #5 Motion to Dismiss,. (Park, Steven) Modified on 2/7/2024 (Licea Chavez, V).
February 5, 2024 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/5/2024: Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending #5 motion to dismiss is SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 3/5/2024 is VACATED, to be reset at a later date if the court determines that oral argument is needed. This order does not impact the filing deadlines for opposition and reply briefs, which shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230.(Buzo, P)
January 30, 2024 Filing 6 OPPOSITION by Benita Gwyn Asher, George W. Condrashoff to #5 Motion to Dismiss,. (Marden, Ryan)
January 16, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to DISMISS by General Motors LLC. Motion Hearing SET for 3/5/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Steven D. Park, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order)(Park, Steven) Modified on 1/18/2024 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
January 11, 2024 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by General Motors LLC. (Park, Steven)
January 9, 2024 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O)
January 8, 2024 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Park, Steven)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin County Superior Court, case number STKCVUBC20230012581 by General Motors LLC. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11278336) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration of Eric Mitchell, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Park, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Condrashoff et al v. General Motors LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George W. Condrashoff
Represented By: Ryan K. Marden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benita Gwyn Asher
Represented By: Ryan K. Marden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Represented By: Steven D. Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?