Pistochini v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al
| Gregg Pistochini |
| Foot Locker Retail, Inc., Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., Eastbay, Inc. Doing business as Eastbay (Wisconsin) Direct and FootLocker.Com/Eastbay, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00155 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy R. Alvarez for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/20/2024: On 02/16/2024, the parties who have appeared in this action filed a #10 joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal of all claims brought against defendant Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., and that defendant Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. be dismissed from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, defendant Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. is hereby dismissed from this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect that defendant Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. has been terminated from this action. (Alvarez, R.) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Partial Dismissal by Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Booth, Laura) Modified on 2/20/2024 (Clemente Licea, O). |
| Filing 9 ANSWER by Foot Locker Retail, Inc..(Booth, Laura) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Booth, Laura) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Gregg Pistochini.(Ramazzini, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/22/2024: On 1/19/2024, the parties filed a #5 stipulation to allow plaintiff to file a first amended complaint by 01/26/2024. Pursuant to that stipulation and good cause appearing, plaintiff shall file his first amended complaint by 01/26/2024. Defendants shall respond, as stipulated, by 02/16/2024. (Buzo, P) |
| Filing 5 JOINT STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading by Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Booth, Laura) Modified on 1/22/2024 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Certificate of Service)(Booth, Laura) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for DAD. (Booth, Laura) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Standing Order, #3 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Placer County Superior Court, case number S-CV_0051404 by Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11289071) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Declaration of Laura M. Booth, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Certificate of Interested Parties, #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Booth, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
