(PC) Whiteman v. Shasta County Jail
| Corry Whiteman |
| Shasta County Jail |
| 2:2024cv00166 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Corry Whiteman. (Woodson, A) |
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Shasta County Jail, Well Path Medical by Corry Whiteman.(Murphy, J) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/15/2024 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Corry Whiteman. The Clerk to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's in forma pauperis application on the Sheriff of Shasta County. (cc: Financial) (Spichka, K.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/15/2024 GRANTING the #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, DENYING the #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel and DIRECTING Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order, #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and New Complaint form served on Corry Whiteman. #9 Order (certified) and #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on the Sheriff of Shasta County. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Corry Whiteman (Murphy, J) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/31/2024 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.(Lopez, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Corry Whiteman. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Corry Whiteman. (Murphy, J) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Murphy, J) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Lopez, K) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Corry Whiteman. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Corry Whiteman. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Shasta County Jail by Corry Whiteman.(Lopez, K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Whiteman v. Shasta County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Corry Whiteman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shasta County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
