Dadbod Apparel LLC v. Hildawn Design LLC et al
| Dadbod Apparel LLC |
| Hildawn Design LLC, Hilary D Wertin and Hilary D. Wertin |
| 2:2024cv00188 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Allison Claire |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 3/14/24 GRANTING #11 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added Attorney James F. McCarthy, III, PHV for Hildawn Design LLC and Hilary D. Wertin. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 15
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 3/14/24 GRANTING #10 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Howard L. Wernow, PHV for Hildawn Design LLC and Hilary D. Wertin. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Kastilahn, A)
|
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 3/14/2024: Due to the reassignment of this action to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta, ECF No. 12, and on the Court's own motion, the hearing on Defendants' #7 Motion to Dismiss, set for oral argument on 4/10/2024 before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire, is VACATED and RESET for 4/11/2024 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 10 before District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and 26, in accordance with E.D. Cal. L.R. 240 and the Court's Case Management Order, ECF No. #13 , and referenced on Judge Calabretta's webpage under Case Management Procedures, within thirty (30) days after the Court's ruling on Defendants' pending #7 Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ENTRY ONLY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:24-cv-0188 DJC AC. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 11 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Hildawn Design LLC for attorney James F. McCarthy III to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 300, receipt number ACAEDC-11400279) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 10 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Hildawn Design LLC for attorney Howard L. Wernow to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 300, receipt number ACAEDC-11400235) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Anderson for Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/06/2024. In light of the recently filed Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. #7 , the due date for the parties' "Consent/Decline of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction" forms is advanced to March 13, 2024. See ECF No. 3. No extensions of this deadline will be permitted. The status of consent will determine whether or not Judge Claire hears the motion. (Text Only Entry)(Anderson, J) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to DISMISS for LACK of JURISDICTION by Hildawn Design LLC. Attorney Anderson, Kirk J. added. Motion Hearing set for 4/10/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum , #2 Declaration of Sophia Auten, #3 Declaration of Hilary Wertin, #4 Notice of Motion)(Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 3/6/2024 (Lopez, K). |
| Filing 6 [DISREGARD - DEFENDANT COUNSEL NOT CAED ADMITTED] STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Dadbod Apparel LLC. (Schaul, Joshua) Modified on 2/23/2024 (Lopez, K). |
| Filing 5 [DISREGARD - NOT SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES] STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Dadbod Apparel LLC. (Schaul, Joshua) Modified on 2/20/2024 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Hilary D. Wertin served 01/30/24. (Schaul, Joshua) Modified on 2/14/2024 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 3 TRADEMARK NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Trademark #1:* 6077397 * * 4/30/2016 * * Dadbod Apparel LLC * Trademark #2:* 6496550 * * 4/30/2016 * * Dadbod Apparel LLC * Trademark #3:* 7138473 * * 4/30/2016 * * Dadbod Apparel LLC * Trademark #4:* 6427449 * * 4/30/2016 * * Dadbod Apparel LLC * Trademark #5:* 6708288 * * 4/30/2016 * * Dadbod Apparel LLC *; copy of Complaint and Trademark Report emailed to U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Trademark Report, #3 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Hildawn Design LLC, Hilary D Wertin* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joshua Adam Schaul* *Garvey Adam LLP* *19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 530* *Irvine, CA 92612*. (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Dadbod Apparel LLC. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11292869) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schaul, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
