Payne v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lamore Payne
Defendant: National Credit Systems, Inc., Comdata Network Inc. of California and Comdata Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv00377
Filed: February 1, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Calabretta
Referring Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Filing 9 [DISREGARD; duplicate - see #7 Stipulation] STIPULATION to Allow Plaintiff to File a Second Amended Complaint by Lamore Payne. (Armas, Andrei) Modified on 2/29/2024 (Michel, G.).
February 29, 2024 Filing 8 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Comdata Inc. by Lamore Payne.(Armas, Andrei)
February 29, 2024 Filing 7 STIPULATION to Allow Plaintiff to File a Second Amended Complaint by Lamore Payne. (Armas, Andrei)
February 28, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Andrei Armas on behalf of Lamore Payne. Attorney Armas, Andrei added. (Armas, Andrei)
February 5, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Lamore Payne* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew M. Loker* *Loker Law, APC* *1303 East Grand Ave, Suite 101* *Arroyo Grande, CA 93420*. (Kastilahn, A)
February 1, 2024 Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Comdata Network Inc. of California by Lamore Payne.(Loker, Matthew)
February 1, 2024 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O)
February 1, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *National Credit Systems, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew M. Loker* *Loker Law, APC* *1303 East Grand Ave., Suite 101* *Arroyo Grande, CA 93420*. (Clemente Licea, O)
February 1, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Credit Systems, Inc. by Lamore Payne. Attorney Loker, Matthew M. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11322866) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Loker, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamore Payne
Represented By: Matthew M. Loker
Represented By: Andrei Armas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Credit Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comdata Network Inc. of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comdata Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?