Espinoza v. Goodleap, LLC. et al
Jorge Loera Espinoza |
Goodleap, LLC., Equifax Information Services, LLC., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
2:2024cv00465 |
February 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
John A Mendez |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to 05/06/2024 to Respond to #1 Complaint by Goodleap, LLC. Attorney Levin, Fredrick S. added. (Levin, Fredrick) Modified on 4/8/2024 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 16 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Goodleap, LLC. served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (Marchiando, Craig) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Trans Union, LLC. served on 3/15/2024, answer due 4/26/2024. (Marchiando, Craig) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 3/18/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (Marchiando, Craig) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/3/2024. (Marchiando, Craig) |
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Herron, Thomas) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to 05/03/2024 to Respond to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Attorney Herron, Thomas J. added. (Herron, Thomas) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by M York Courtroom Deputy for Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/01/2024 GRANTING unopposed #8 motion and EXTENDING, to 04/26/2024, Defendant Trans Union, LLC's Answer to #1 Complaint. (York, M) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Trans Union, LLC.. (Singh, Ritika) |
Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME to File Answer by Trans Union, LLC. Attorney Singh, Ritika added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Singh, Ritika) Modified on 4/2/2024 (Benson, A.). |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by M York Courtroom Deputy for Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/01/2024 APPROVING #6 Stipulation and EXTENDING, to 05/03/2024, Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC's Answer to #1 Complaint. (York, M) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for extension of time to respond to initial complaint by not more than 28 days by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hodsden, Alice) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hodsden, Alice) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Alice Hodsden on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. Attorney Hodsden, Alice added. (Hodsden, Alice) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Equifax Information Services, LLC., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Goodleap, LLC., Trans Union, LLC.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Craig Carley Marchiando* *Consumer Litigation Associates* *763 J. Clyde Morris Blvd. Suite 1-A* *Newport News, VA 23601*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Goodleap, LLC., Trans Union, LLC. by Jorge Loera Espinoza. Attorney Marchiando, Craig Carley added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11347268) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marchiando, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.