(PC) Kalso v. Rupp et al
| Zachary Lloyd Kalso |
| Rupp and Butte County Sheriff Office |
| 2:2024cv00467 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PLAINTIFF'S ADDRESS UPDATED to 1461 Eaton Rd., Chico, CA 95973 pursuant to notice filed on 3/28/2024 in case 2:24-cv-0653. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Nair, C) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Lopez, K) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Zachary Lloyd Kalso. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Zachary Lloyd Kalso. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Butte County Sheriff Office, Rupp by Zachary Lloyd Kalso.(Lopez, K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
