Gill v. U.S. Dept. of State et al
| Manmeet Singh Gill |
| United States Department of State, U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, India, Antony Blinken and David J. Ranz |
| 2:2024cv00621 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/23/2024: On 4/22/2024, the parties in this action filed an #8 stipulation for a proposed briefing schedule as to defendants' pending #7 motion for dismissal and summary judgment. Pursuant to the stipulation and good cause appearing, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants' #7 motion by no later than 5/17/2024. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their #7 motion by no later than 5/27/2024.(Wood, J) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file Responsive Pleading by Manmeet Singh Gill. (Castro, Christina) Modified on 4/23/2024 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to DISMISS by Antony Blinken, David J. Ranz, U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, India, United States Department of State. Motion Hearing set for 6/4/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, #2 Declaration of Samuel W. McDonald)(Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Antony Blinken,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for David J. Ranz,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, India,Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for United States Department of State (Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Manmeet Singh Gill. U.S. Department of State, U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, India, Anthony Blinken, David J. Ranz, and Consul General of the United States at the U.S. Consulate in Mumbai, India served: 03/11/24; Merrick Garland, Attorney General: served 03/05/24. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS receipts)(Castro, Christina) Modified on 3/15/2024 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/25/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Antony Blinken, David J. Ranz, U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, India, United States Department of State* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Christina Sullivan Castro* *Hacking Immigration Law LLC* *10121 Manchester Rd., Suite A* *St. Louis, MO 63122*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Manmeet Singh Gill. Attorney Castro, Christina Sullivan added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11364411) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castro, Christina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
