Doe v. County of San Joaquin et al
Jane Doe |
County of San Joaquin, San Joaquin Sheriff's Office, Michael Reynolds and Patrick Withrow |
2:2024cv00899 |
March 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Watson, Joshua) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *County of San Joaquin, Michael Reynolds, San Joaquin Sheriff's Office, Patrick Withrow* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joshua H. Watson* *Clayeo C. Arnold, APC* *865 Howe Avenue* *Sacramento, CA 95825*. (Clemente Licea, O) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED UNDER A PSEUDONYM by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Watson, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jane Doe. Attorney Watson, Joshua H. added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11417073) (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Watson, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.