Tabatabaee et al v. Blinken et al
| Hadi Tabatabaee and Sayed Hamed Tabatabaei |
| Antony J. Blinken and Carson Wu |
| 2:2024cv00905 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| William B Shubb |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/15/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior District Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Antony J. Blinken, Carson Wu* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Curtis Lee Morrison* *Red Eagle Law, L.C.* *5256 S. Mission Road Suite 135* *Bonsall, CA 92003*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Hadi Tabatabaee, Sayed Hamed Tabatabaei (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Hadi Tabatabaee, Sayed Hamed Tabatabaei . Attorney Morrison, Curtis Lee added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11420248) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Declarations of Defendant Wu, #2 Exhibit B 221(g) Non-Final Decision, #3 Exhibit C Ceac Case Status, #4 Exhibit D Inquiries with Embassy, #5 Exhibit E CEAC Summary Showing Abu Dhabi)(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
