M.F. et al v. Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District et al
M. F., John Doe and Vanessa Doe |
Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, Emma Blanche Shaffer and Megan Ann Meschery |
2:2024cv01009 |
April 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER re AMENDED Proposed Order re #3 Motion to Proceedy by Pseudonyms, #6 Proposed Order by John Doe, Vanessa Doe, M. F.. (Thigpen, Jordanna) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER re Motion re #3 Motion to Proceedy by Pseudonyms by John Doe, Vanessa Doe, M. F.. (Thigpen, Jordanna) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Megan Ann Meschery, Emma Blanche Shaffer, Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jordanna G. Thigpen* *Thigpen Legal, P.C.* *9595 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 961* *Beverly Hills, CA 90212*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO PROCEED BY PSEUDONYMS All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aaron E. Doyle)(Thigpen, Jordanna) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by All Plaintiffs. (Thigpen, Jordanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11438976) (Thigpen, Jordanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.