(PC) Carrasco Carrasco v. Stanislaus County Sheriff et al
| Rafael Carrasco Carrasco |
| Stanislaus County Sheriff, Well Path, Linda A. McFadden, Broshears, Konstantelos and Stanislaus County Public Defenders Office |
| 2:2024cv01110 |
| April 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Allison Claire |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Flores, E) |
Filing 3
ORDER Transferring Case to Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California and Closing Case in Fresno Division signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 04/12/2024. CASE TRANSFERRRED to Sacramento Division. New Case Number 2:24-cv-1110 AC.(Flores, E)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Rafael Carrasco Carrasco. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rafael Carrasco Carrasco. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Broshears, Konstantelos, Linda A. McFadden, Stanislaus County Public Defenders Office, Stanislaus County Sheriff, Well Path by Rafael Carrasco Carrasco.(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
