Ascot Specialty Insurance Company v. Goyette, Ruano & Thompson, Inc. et al
Ascot Specialty Insurance Company |
Goyette, Ruano & Thompson, Inc., Daniel Thompson and Joshua Siipola |
2:2024cv01365 |
May 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Chi Soo Kim |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/10/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Goyette, Ruano & Thompson, Inc., Joshua Siipola, Daniel Thompson* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Alec H. Boyd* *Clyde & Co US LLP* *150 California St, Suite 15th Fl* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Ascot Specialty Insurance Company. (Boyd, Alec) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Ascot Specialty Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11519921) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(Boyd, Alec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.