(PS) Singh Randhawa et al v. Dept. of Homeland Security et al
| Vrinder Singh Randhawa, Mandeep Sandu Randhawa and A. K. R. |
| Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Enforcement, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States of America |
| 2:2024cv01540 |
| May 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Chi Soo Kim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Enforcement, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Vrinder Singh Randhawa* *1152 Boxelder Circle* *Folsom, CA 95630*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Vrinder Singh Randhawa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benson, A.) |
| SERVICE AT FRONT COUNTER: #2 Summons, #3 Civil New Case Documents for DAD served on Vrinder Singh Randhawa. (Benson, A.) |
| RECEIPT number 200007314 for $405.00 from Vrinder S. Randhawa. (Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
